top of page

Docketwise Review: Is It the Right Immigration Case Management Tool for Your Law Firm?

Writer: Josh LurieJosh Lurie

Updated: Mar 9

A Comprehensive Look at Docketwise for Immigration Law Firms


Table of Contents


 

Intro

Running a modern law practice means staying organized, and case management software is a key part of that equation. These tools are designed to simplify everything from onboarding new clients and tracking cases to managing your calendar, tasks, and even firm finances. For general law practices, platforms like Clio stand out, offering robust features that cover nearly every aspect of running a firm.


But immigration law is different. The field’s complexity and its reliance on forms, filings, and ever-changing rules demand software tailored to its unique challenges. This is where immigration-specific case management tools shine, offering solutions that cater to the needs of immigration attorneys.


 

What is Docketwise?

Docketwise is a case management system specifically designed for immigration lawyers. Launched in 2016, it quickly established itself as a modern alternative to legacy platforms. Today, it serves more than 10,000 immigration law firms helping with case management, practice management and immigration forms.


While it remains the most used case management platform for immigration law firms, only 22% of American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) members reported using Docketwise in the organization’s 2024 survey. Docketwise users' biggest complaint is its supporting evidence document collection capability.


Pairing Docketwise with Pigeon for Document Collection


For firms looking to overcome Docketwise’s document collection limitations, pairing it with Pigeon can make a significant difference. Pigeon specializes in streamlining document requests, collection, and tracking, offering greater customization, flexibility, and more robust functionality than Docketwise. 


The Measurable Impact of Pigeon


Immigration law firms that pair Pigeon with Docketwise experience faster case processing, reduced administrative burden, and improved client compliance. Here’s how Pigeon delivers real results:


50% Faster Document Turnaround – Clients submit required documents in half the time thanks to automated reminders and an intuitive client interface.


88% Reduction in Follow-Up Emails – Automated tracking, reminders, and progress updates eliminate unnecessary back-and-forth.


47% Reduction in Administrative Work – Automated tracking, built-in file format conversion (e.g., .HEIC to PDF), and one-click document compilation eliminate manual tasks, saving staff hours per case.


97% Submission Completion Rate – Clients complete and submit full document sets with fewer errors, reducing delays in case preparation.


For firms seeking a solution to modernize their document collection alongside their case management system, Pigeon is the perfect complement to platforms like Docketwise.


Book a demo today to see how Pigeon can enhance your workflow.

 

Pros of Docketwise


  1. Modern, Easy-to-Use Interface

When Docketwise entered the market, many immigration lawyers were stuck using outdated software. Docketwise changed that with its sleek, intuitive design. Docketwise is often praised for its ease of use, making it an attractive option, especially for attorneys.

Pipefile’s dashboard lacks key components like team collaboration and request data.

  1. Strong Form and Questionnaire Tools

Immigration practices revolve around forms. Docketwise simplifies the process with prebuilt templates and streamlined questionnaires that clients can complete with minimal guidance.


  1. Integration-Friendly with an Open API

Docketwise plays well with others. Its open API allows tools to create a Docketwise integration, enabling seamless and connected workflows.


 

Cons of Docketwise


  1. Limited Feature Set for Larger Practices

While Docketwise’s simplicity is an advantage for many, firms with highly complex workflows or niche requirements may find its feature set less robust compared to some competitors. Advanced capabilities and custom workflows are often lacking where other tools might excel.


  1. Missing Key Document Collection Features

One common complaint from users is the lack of capability around document collection, which makes document collection difficult when using Docketwise alone. Document collection is a generic add-on to Docketwise's core forms functionality, so its client portal lacks flexibility, customization, and user-friendliness. Docketwise users often use Pigeon alongside the case management platform to solve for its document collection shortcomings.


  1. Language Support Falls Short

Docketwise supports 12 languages, which is helpful but may not be inclusive enough for firms with diverse client bases.

Pipefile’s dashboard lacks key components like team collaboration and request data.

 

Should Your Firm Choose Docketwise?


Docketwise is a strong contender in the immigration case management space. Its intelligent questionnaires and form automation make it a top option for firms looking for a modern, user-friendly platform. However, its document collection limitations and lack of advanced tracking features mean many firms supplement it with additional tools.


That’s where Pigeon comes in.


If your firm is struggling with the inefficiencies of document collection, Pigeon’s comprehensive suite of document management tools ensures you never miss a file, deadline, or submission. Whether you’re using Docketwise, Cerenade, or another case management system, Pigeon integrates seamlessly to handle the most frustrating part of immigration casework—so you don’t have to.



Explore other tools in the market by reading: Top 5 Docketwise Alternatives for Immigration Law Firms.



bottom of page